Monthly Archives: July 2009

People with Guns Kill

 steve-mcnair.jpg

The incredibly powerful lobby, the NRA, is constantly reminding us, especially when there is yet another senseless murder, that guns don’t kill, people do.

That is true. But it is also true that while alcohol doesn’t drive a car into an accident, people who drive under the influence of alcohol do. We therefore heavily regulate the consumption of alcohol to save lives. But unlike alcohol, which is not specifically designed for driving, guns are made to kill.

Guns and people just don’t mix because while guns don’t kill, people with guns do.

3 Comments

Filed under Essays

Reflecting on Independence

us_declaration_independence.jpg

Ever since I was a kid I always loved the Fourth of July. At first, of course, I liked the fact that my grandmother let us play with minor pyrotechnics (i.e., sparklers) that we’d put out in the pool with a sizzle. But, even at a young age I had an appreciation for the central figure of the holiday, the Declaration of Independence. And as I got older, I grew even more impressed with our founding document.

With such efficiency of language, the Declaration of Independence beautifully sets forth — what I believe to still be true up to the present day — the fundamental underlying relationship that ties the state to the people its governs. And being the inherently legal document that it was, the Declaration lists the ways in which the King of England had violated that bind, and therefore the people had a “[right and duty] to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

While watching the moving protests in the streets of Tehran and, at the same time listening to the same pundits who just recently wanted us to obliterate Iran now show the Iranians their heartfelt support, I kept thinking about America’s own revolutionary past and its present dislike for armed revolution. Continue reading

4 Comments

Filed under Digressions, Essays

On Barking and Biting

Sarah Palin’s resignation speech was even quirkier than Governor Sanford’s recent M.I.A. speech, and perhaps as embarrassingly unskilled as her interviews with Katie Curic. In less than a year, Sarah Barracuda, the self-proclaimed pit bull in lipstick, has gone from the realm of the cynical to the purely bizarre.

My first reaction after hearing Sarah Palin’s speech at the 2008 Republican Presidential Convention was that it was cynical, aggressive, arrogant, and mean spirited. The virtually unknown Alaskan governor got up on stage and delivered a series of boastful one-liners about her own superior toughness while ridiculing her opponent’s professional record.

If Judge Sotomayor thinks that she has an advantageous perspective over white men, well, Sarah Palin’s entire argument (and the image that McCain ticket ran on) was that as a gun-tooting, small town Christian hockey mom, she was tougher and more qualified than a mere city dwelling organizer with an All American education. And while Palin was on tour denouncing Obama for not being American enough, she was arguing behind the scenes with the McCain campaign to cover up her husband’s seven year membership in the Alaskan secessionist party. Interesting that the anti-Palin liberal press never reported on any of the two inconsistencies.

Now less than a year later, Sarah Barracuda is crying that the mainstream press is not nice, proving the old adage true that the pit bull, with or without lipstick, is all bark and no bite.

At the end of the day, though, I feel sorry for Sarah Palin. She was thrust into the national spotlight and, much like Susan Boyle, was completely unprepared intellectually or emotionally for Prime Time. Of course, her original lack of humility didn’t help.

3 Comments

Filed under Essays

The Post is Toast

washpost-toast.jpg

Now this is a scandal . . . asking money from lobbyists in return for access to your newsroom.

2 Comments

Filed under Essays

From Tehran to Rabat to Washington

I have been to Rabat twice and, for “family” reasons, I will be spending much more time there in the future. So on Tuesday morning when I found an op-ed in the Washington Post about Rabat (by Anne Applebaum) I was very interested.

Applebaum’s article, “In Morocco, an Alternative to Iran”, contrasted how the Iranian government suppressed protestors in Tehran with how citizens freely and peacefully protest in Morocco’s capital. Typical me, I immediately wrote an email to Applebaum criticizing the comparison as absurd and untenable, complaining about the media’s childish obsession with categorizing a vast cultural and geographic expanse as a single unified group. It is like, as I wrote to Applebaum, comparing Berlin, Germany to La Paz, Bolvia or Mexican Catholics to Romanian Orthodox Christians. Yes, both Rabat and Tehran have majority Muslims populations (as well as Jewish minorities, although that comparison wasn’t made), but they share little else culturally, historically or linguistically. And religiously, they are as different as Catholics and Protestants.

Much to my surprise, Applebaum promptly wrote me a very kind email in response. Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Essays

Press Gets It Wrong, Again

air-france-crash.jpg

I can’t tell you how many times I read confident press reports about the fate of the May 31st Air France flight from Rio to Paris. Remember the story “Air France Crash Autopsies Suggest Flight Broke Up in Air” that was picked up by just about everyone and the mothers? Well, breaking news, the press got it wrong again. The plane crashed intact into the sea, and the sensors were not the cause of the accident. I shouldn’t have been surprised, I was forewarned.

Meanwhile, the press gave comparably almost no coverage whatsoever to the plane that crashed into the sea yesterday near the Comoros Islands, except for mentioning the number of French passengers on board. The doomed flight of 150 Africans must not seem newsworthy, at least that was until they found one miraculous 14 year old survivor the press could sell.

1 Comment

Filed under Essays