Bill Can Speak

bill-gives-good-speech.jpg

I have never hid the fact the I both admire Bill Clinton’s great political gifts and despise how he wastes those gifts with his divisive antics. I also have to admit that the Democratic Convention, and I am sure the Republican one will be the same, is a load of over-the-top only-in-America trash. Having said this, Bill Clinton reminded us last night of what an amazing orator he is. He might truly believe what he said, he might not. He’s Bill Clinton, and he’s as good an actor as Ronald Reagan ever was, plus he’s also a lawyer, and last night he sure looked like he was missing being the country’s head hauncho.

Love him or hate him, Bill made the compelling argument of why the U.S. cannot afford another Republican term in the White House. Another Bill — Bill Moyers — in the same vain made a similar argument in last week’s Journal:

As wages stagnate, prices are soaring. Economists call this pain the “misery index.” It’s a combination of the unemployment and inflation rates, and it’s what politicians have in mind when they ask, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” Well, the misery index is the highest it’s been since George Bush’s father became president, seventeen years ago.

. . .

This year oil hit a record high – $147 a barrel when last year, it was less than half that – around $68. A loaf of bread is up 14% from last year, a dozen eggs is up 33%, and pizza makers have seen the cost of their cheese soar from $1.30 to $1.76. Flour used to make the dough has tripled in price. As these prices soar, the value of homes is sinking. One in three home buyers since 2003 now owe more than their property’s estimated worth. Not only has home equity plummeted, so has the value of other holdings, like stocks and bonds and pensions, the investments families count on as a cushion during hard times.

Has the Bush Admininstration done anything that was not destructive?

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Bill Gets Dissed

 Bill Gets Dissed

A lot will be written (mostly today) about how Hillary’s speech, although well delivered, was merely a half-hearted praisal of Obama. Richard Cohen called it “when you can’t say something nice“. But can anyone really be surprised about Hillary making it all about herself? She talked about herself, her issues, her campaign, her outfits, and the women who supported her. Some are saying that Hillary dissed Obama. Nevertheless, Hillary was just being her self-loving self, but what I found more surprising was her strongest dis.

Hillary started out her speech, introducing herself . . . “I am a proud mother . . .” At that moment, I looked at my own mother and said, “Mom, watch and see what she does not say, what she does not say she’s proud to be”.

I am honored to be here tonight. A proud mother. A proud Democrat. A proud American. And a proud supporter of Barack Obama.

That’s right! Curiously absent was a declaration of being “a proud wife”. She was a proud supporter of Barack and mother to Chelsea, but her husband — making his stupid condescending faces — was the real one to get dissed. Go girl.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

The Press, Obama and McCain

obama-biden.jpg

As I have mentioned previously, the press may talk more about Obama than McCain, but they are easier on McCain. Regardless of the evidence, it is always Obama who has problems with women, white men, and is fairing poorly in the polls. Obama is an unknown entity, and we all know exactly what McCains thinks and/or will do as president. As Frank Rich writes today in the New York Times,

What we have learned this summer is this: McCain’s trigger-happy temperament and reactionary policies offer worse than no change. He is an unstable bridge back not just to Bush policies but to an increasingly distant 20th-century America that is still fighting Red China in Vietnam and the Soviet Union in the cold war. As the country tries to navigate the fast-moving changes of the 21st century, McCain would put America on hold.

What Obama also should have learned by now is that the press is not his friend. Of course, he gets more ink and airtime than McCain; he’s sexier news. But as George Mason University’s Center for Media and Public Affairs documented in its study of six weeks of TV news reports this summer, Obama’s coverage was 28 percent positive, 72 percent negative. (For McCain, the split was 43/57.) Even McCain’s most blatant confusions, memory lapses and outright lies still barely cause a ripple, whether he’s railing against a piece of pork he in fact voted for, as he did at the Saddleback Church pseudodebate last weekend, or falsifying crucial details of his marital history in his memoirs, as The Los Angeles Times uncovered in court records last month.

. . .

Is a man who is just discovering the Internet qualified to lead a restoration of America’s economic and educational infrastructures? Is the leader of a virtually all-white political party America’s best salesman and moral avatar in the age of globalization? Does a bellicose Vietnam veteran who rushed to hitch his star to the self-immolating overreaches of Ahmad Chalabi, Pervez Musharraf and Mikheil Saakashvili have the judgment to keep America safe?

And then there is the POW card that McCain plays, as Maureen Dowd, explains Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Humming Birds, Flowers, Eric Dolphy and More

Conversations is not the easiest Eric Dolphy LP to get your hands on. Iron Man, recorded at the same time, is much more accessible. Nevertheless, Conversations is a very interesting Dolphy recording, with great performances by a wide range of artists. For example, the song in this video, “Music Matador”, features Dolphy alongside Prince Lasha (flute), Sonny Simmons (alto), Clifford Jordan (soprano), Richard Davis (bass), and Charles Moffet (drums). There is also an interesting bass clarinet and bass duet, “Alone Together”.

I wanted to share this music with something else interesting as well, so I combined it with video footage of a Maryland garden full of Black-eyed Susans, Gold Finches, and even a Humming Bird. Enjoy the eclectic randomness of it all.

Leave a comment

Filed under Digressions, Jazz

Dazed and Confused

I just read, finally, a great op-ed by Frank Rich called “The Candidate We Still Don’t Know” that addresses the very point I have been making for a long time: the media is playing it easy on John McCain. No one is pressing him on his George W. Bush-like mental agility and missteps, his extremist friends and voting records, his policy changes for political convenience, and they seem to be trying to keep this race as close as possible.

McCain is a war veteran and former POW, but that is all we hear about him. No one mentions that he can’t use a computer or email, he often sounds  confused, or how Corsi (the guy who just wrote the anti-Obama book published by a famous Republican pundit) has also alleged that McCain has  financial ties to al Qaeda and Arizona mafia. And while the press questions Michelle Obama, we haven’t learned about Cindy McCain’s vast wealth and lobby connections.

What has recently irked me immensely, though, was John McCain’s speech the other day about the conflict in Georgia and Russia. McCain announced that he had spoken with the president of Georgia and said, “I told him that I know I speak for every American when I said to him, today, we are all Georgians.” Does John McCain or Barack Obama, at this point, have the right to speak for American people? Sorry, buddy, but you don’t speak for me.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Has European Basketball Really Improved since ’92?

redeem-team.jpg

In my brother’s blog today, he asks whether, after beating top metal contender Spain by almost 40 points, the U.S. national basketball team, dubbed the Redeem Team, is better than its 1992 predecessor the Dream Team. I commented as follows:

I read an interesting statistic in the Spanish sport’s paper Marca today that during the ’92 Olympics, the Dream Team beat Spain by 41 points. Today the Redeem Team beat Spain by 37 points.

There is no doubt that today’s Spain team is far superior, as is the international competition overall, to its ’92 predecessor. That can only mean two things: first the U.S. team today is better than the ’92 dream team, or that the U.S.’s defeats during the last 16 years was due more to the U.S.’s fault than the rest of the world’s achievement.

So now my question is, is the 2008 Spanish team better than its 1992 predecessor? Or better yet, has European ball really improved or were recent U.S. teams simply too arrogant in not taking international play seriously? Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Essays, Living la vida española

Puer Robustus Sed Malitiosus

marx-v.jpg

Check out my brother’s cool new blog: Robustus Sed Malitiosus. I have no idea what that means, but it covers a interesting mix of topics from social change, politics, propaganda, dating, living in Brooklyn, and his dog.

Leave a comment

Filed under Friends / Family

You’ve Got to Be Kidding Me

gwb.jpg

And so sayeth George W. Bush:

Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity must be respected . . .

Bullying and intimidation are not acceptable ways to conduct foreign policy in the 21st century . . . Only Russia can decide whether it will now put itself back on the path of responsible nations or continue to pursue a policy that promises only confrontation and isolation.

For the reasons stated in the previous post, W. can’t really think that he has any right to tell anyone how to conduct foreign policy? You’ve gotta be kidding me!

1 Comment

Filed under Essays

What the Russian/Georgian Crisis Says About the U.S.

connie-go.jpg

I suppose that the first thing we could say about the recent conflict between Russia and Georgia is how President Bush and his State Department have once again dropped the ball. When you look a little closer, it reveals some basic facts about the decay of U.S. authority in the world:

  • The U.S. has no moral authority to tell the Russians or anyone else not to unilaterally invade another country, especially a region of strategic oil importance (which Georgia is). The U.S. did something very similar in Iraq. Furthermore, the U.S. lacks the authority to criticize Russia on the “collateral damage” of civilian lives. There has never been a serious conversation in the U.S. (by the government, citizens, or the press) about the hundreds of thousands of civilians who were directly the victims of the U.S. bombings in Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • Georgia has sent a large percentage of its armed forces as troops to Iraq, and yet the U.S. is unable to protect its ally from Russia (either in the form of military or political support).
  • The U.S. has limited bargaining / diplomatic weight in the matter. France’s Sarko has powdered his nose and is running around doing all of the diplomatic work that the U.S. used to do. This trend, as we have seen with Turkey and Qatar in the Middle East, highlights the U.S. diminishing role as a power broker.
  • The U.S. is, at present, ill-prepared to deal with potential military threats. Regardless of what John McCain may think, the U.S. needs to get out of Iraq. It is over-exposed in Iraq and simply does not have the resources at hand to deal with any new, foreseeable or unforeseeable conflict that may arise. Compromising security by keeping soldiers in Iraq (to protect oil fields or so that McCain can say “we won the war”) is grossly irresponsible.
  • The U.S. has no moral authority to criticize either Russia or Georgia on human rights. The Bush Administration — through its policies of torture and foreign detentions — has the worst human rights records of any developed nation.
  • No matter how you look at it, the U.S.’s efforts to get all of Russia’s neighbors to join NATO — a cold war military alliance with military bases and missiles pointed at Russia — from a Russian standpoint is very threatening and feels like intentional isolation.
  • While I do not promote nuclear proliferation or would ever want countries like Iran to have nuclear capabilities, the U.S.’s insistence that only selective nation’s have the nukes, together with its record of unilateral invasions, make it very easy for nations to convince their people that the U.S. is a real threat. Think about it. You live in the Middle East. The U.S and Israel have the most state of the art armed forces in the world and say that no one else is allowed to have similar technology. Everyone now knows that the U.S. invaded Iraq based on false pretenses just for oil. What stops it from bombing another country (say Iran) in the region based on false evidence? And if one country gets the nukes, then the other ones need them too. Meanwhile, as mentioned above, the U.S. is getting all of Russia’s neighbors and former members of the Soviet block to join NATO and some of them — Poland and Georgia — to fight in U.S. wars. Has the Bush Administration, through its draconian foreign policy, unwillingly started a news arms race?

Finally, the Russian / Georgia crisis also says something about the E.U. and its inability to manage its surroundings. Regardless of Sarko being “out and about”, the fact of the matter is that the E.U. continues to be a compelling idea but not a reality.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays

Remember the (Star) War Years

star-wars.JPG

I remember the war years, the Star Wars years. Back in my FON days when I was working with the Hombres de Negro (Guille, Juantxo and Aitor), I used to watch these new generation kids praising 70s icons like Darth Vader or Kiss. Hey, I lived Star Wars. I went to see it in the movie theater in 1977, before my girlfriend was even born. I remember the whole Star Wars craze, everyone in the streets sporting space age fashion, and my childhood thirst for the action figures and accessories (some of which I still have today). I even went to a Kiss Dynasty tour concert in 1979.

Just to put it all into prospective, my old Star Wars sheets have survived . . . twenty-nine years later.

2 Comments

Filed under Digressions, FON, Friends / Family