Nice video, but I doubt their conclusion.
Twitter
- RT @notstevenwhite: When this country was founded, the Supreme Court had 6 members and the filibuster didn't exist yet 7 hours ago
- RT @AriBerman: 5 of 6 conservative Supreme Court justices were appointed by GOP presidents who initially lost popular vote & confirmed by s… 22 hours ago
- RT @MattGertz: Another normal day on a normal website. https://t.co/6ixlnNaIfc 2 days ago
- RT @joehas: “The Emirates are – for the ninth year running – the country where most young Arabs want to live: 46% declared it their favorit… 2 days ago
- This is in fact-as far as I am aware- not what is being proposed. Travelers would be required to show proof of a ne… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 days ago
- I guess that would be “socializing” social media twitter.com/mjs_dc/status/… 4 days ago
- RT @NateSilver538: Just 222 COVID deaths reported in the US yesterday, which is the fewest since March 23, 2020. ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths ht… 4 days ago
- No, Sr. Clemente, racista es él que dice cosas racistas. Y ya está marca.com/radio/2021/04/… 5 days ago
- RT @CT_Bergstrom: 1. In the op-ed pages of newspapers and on cable news shows, I'm seeing frequent confusion over what it means to reach he… 5 days ago
- RT @EricDKoch: Seinfeld, The Vaccine: George hasn’t seen his parents since 2020 “I could just not get it, and never see them again” Krame… 5 days ago
- I love this message twitter.com/Pontifex/statu… 6 days ago
- This is why I stopped reading it!!!!! twitter.com/AlmagroSchool/… 1 week ago
- This make absolutely no scientific sense. twitter.com/MollyJongFast/… 1 week ago
-
Categories
-
Recent Posts
Goodreads
Meta
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- December 2018
- June 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
Grave Error · Essays, Prose and other Digressions
i actually have the opposite feeling. The video wasn’t that great, but i do think that individuals can make a difference.
ReWrite,
I didn’t mean that people can’t make a difference . . . I meant that one’s signature doesn’t make the difference.
it is the same concept.
it all depends on your definition of signature… writing an op-ed could be considered your signature.
imagine if numerous people signed a check for the same cause. and having worked on the Hill, i know that the reps do pay some attention to the letters they get.
i write letters and court papers (and affirm) all of the time that have an influence (the micro-level). W/out my client’s “signed” affidavit, many of these papers are considered technically invalid.
so i think one’s signature is important.
I would have to go more towards what Eric is saying here.
Although I understand the relevance of Rewrite’s point, I would have to say that in the larger number of instances not pertaining to the law perspective, a signature bears little meaning.
Especially in this country, anything written is all too easily and often ignored for personal agenda.
a signature by Picasso easily makes an over 200,000 dollar difference
or zomzin
And a gift with a signature by tiffanys will get you laid. Not that I’ve done that…
Oh! And your spray painted signature on a wall in soho will get you 24 hours time
Forged signatures are cool, but will get you in a boat load of trouble.
A tattooed signature of EPE on your ear will make you erics Biaaaatch for life and you may not want that
SO, ReWrite is correct. A signature is important
a signature by Picasso easily makes an over 200,000 dollar difference
It is the value of the imagery he created that made the signature of importance. (action)
And a gift with a signature by tiffanys will get you laid.
Subjective; might get you laid, likely will just get you a gold digger who will empty your bank account and leave you for someone who has something with the same signature. It is in the giving of the gift that the possibility lies. (action)
Oh! And your spray painted signature on a wall in soho will get you 24 hours time
It is the action, not the signature, that gets you attention from law officials.
Forged signatures are cool, but will get you in a boat load of trouble.
Same as previous.
You are confusing symbology and action, and without action, the symbology is summarily valueless.
Logically, quite simple to understand.
Actually, jams:
Value of imagery is subjective. Value of signature is not. That is the biggest silent truth when it comes to art dealing. Like Picasso said once. “this signature just made me 50,000 dollars”
And it’s not because his signature was nice.
The gift of giving. Ahh how romantic james!. But i was not talking about gold digging. I was talking about getting laid. The act of penetration, not a romantic act of making love. who care about the gold digger, the point was getting laid. You are confusing the two. Hard to explain for some, but trust me, there is a differance.
Graffiti: The act of spry painting. the moving about of the arms while spray painting a surface. That is the action. The result, a vandalized public or private space by leaving your signature is what gets your attention to officials. That is the signature not the act of leaving it.
You are confused
logically, quite simple to understand
in a more simple less jive term:
Unless you(plural) are a mime,
The “gift of giving” fails without the gift (the signature).
If you can understand this simple idea, then you can apply it to pretty much everything.
And yes I’ll let you use this quote for your future references.
This is what a response looks like in the absence of logic.
No action as a precursory definer for an observer, a signature, any signature, is without any significance.
Picasso was an artist, so his lack of analytical ability is almost forgiveable. Almost. Thankfully, his grandson Theodore, did not suffer from that particular affliction.
I suggest spending some time with David Hume to correct the error of perspective. The human mind induces connectivity predicated upon action, as an observing entity. Without which, nothing can be declared to have value.
We also find in the micro perspective, it is the observer of an action/event that is the cause of behavior, via quantum entanglement.
Nice try though.
And i suggest that you practice using your very own thought process rather than relying too much on what you read to form an opinion like do so much.
You can suggest I read all of NY public library via quantum teleportation and it still would not change the fact that rather than insightful your comments are void of meaning.
Never rely on others insights to form yours.
Your attempt at being pragmatic is an attempt. Your posts are a result of my signature. An observer of an action/event that never defines itself is just an observer waiting to make a conclusion. Kind of what you are doing now waiting for my reply. You don’t know what you are going to say until i hit the submit button…..
Clear as purple crayons
And lets not get into Picasso, I have a masters in the subject.
Your masters in Art bears little weight, but obviously, you should have spent more time studying something besides art.
Relying on one’s own authority, beyond making a pompous windbag, makes one constantly in error.
I give credit to superior minds from whom I learn. I’m fully aware, there are many with which I can never compete, so it is better to learn from them.
Knowing one’s limitations, is always the first step.
But the conversation is now banal. Arguing on the internet is exactly like running in the Special Olympics; even if you win, you’re still a retard.
my friend, the definition of pompuos widnbag came about from the first post you ever subitted online.
“I give credit to superior minds from whom I learn. I’m fully aware, there are many with which I can never compete”
Are you for real? where do you come from?
And let’s leave the discussion there.
Have a nice day, come back soon!
Somehow i missed all of these posts until now. you guys are hilarious.
i hope you didn’t scare/steer eric further away from political posts… b/c the holiday and other posts (let’s see who read more books this year) are boring/depressing.
talk about Pakistan… there is some real shit going on there… lots of issues to discuss.
yea, i like pakistani rice. Have you tried the samosas?