Category Archives: Essays

20th Century Rhetoric for the 21st Century

reagan-mccain.jpg

As an American living in Europe where the root word “social” is considered a democratic value, I often tell people about how growing up in the U.S. in the 1970s and 80s we were taught to fear all things “social” as dangerous manifestations of Soviet communism. Being called a “commie” or a “socialist” was an insult, for everyone knew that “commies eat your mommies”.

So it’s is kind of funny to hear, almost twenty years after the so called “Fall of Communism”, the Republicans accusing Barack Obama of being a socialist. Sarah Palin recently said on the campaign trail that Joe the Plumber thought Obama’s tax plan sounded like socialism, as if either Sarah or Joe actually knew the definition of socialism. The bailout is wealth redistribution, and taxes, by definition, are wealth redistribution.

But when I thought about it more closely, I wondered, why are the Republicans so obsessed with reliving the Cold War? Between the time they have dedicated to Bill Ayers, the anti-Vietnam War terrorist from when Obama was eight, and now this absurd fear of socialism, you’d think that McCain Palin wanted to go back to 20th Century and fight the spread of communism all over again. Maybe with a new surge we could finally claim victory in Vietnam.

McCain would obviously rather cast himself as a Reagan than a Bush. But does that really justify revisiting 20th Century rhetoric for addressing 21 Century reality.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Colin Powell

This morning I watched Colin Powell’s very moving endorsement of Barack Obama for president. It was moving for many different reasons – Powell, a life long Republican and long time friend of John McCain, is one of the most uniformly respected figures in America. He plainly and eloquently stated what most centrist people have been thinking about John McCain: McCain is a respectable candidate and hero, but his campaign has simply gone too far to the right with its choice of Palin and its negative tone. He then goes on to praise Obama as a transformative figure in U.S. politics.

Most importantly, I believe, Powell is uniquely situated (as he is respected across party lines) to honestly state the obvious. The obvious being, first that Palin is (categorically) not qualified to be vice president, second — and it is shockingly amazing that this needs to be said — that

I’m also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, “Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim.” Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he’s a Christian.  He’s always been a Christian.  But the really right answer is, what if he is?  Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer’s no, that’s not America.  Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president?  Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, “He’s a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists.” This is not the way we should be doing it in America.

Ironically, after listening to Powell’s straight forward reasoning and overwhelmingly statesman-like presence, I wonder how many voters out there are thinking that this election has nothing to do with military experience or race because they would much rather elect Colin Powell as president than John McCain or Barack Obama.

2 Comments

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

The Real Voter Fraud

mark-crispin-miller.jpg

If you’ve been concerned by the Republican cry of fraud over Acorn, maybe it’s time to think again (or think twice — he who casts the first stone). Acorn is a non-issue. It’s a ruse, a disguise, one in a series of tactics to distract voters and to rally Republicans to cry “foul play” in the event of an Obama victory. Not only was John McCain Acorn’s key note speaker in 2006, Acorn was the one who brought into question some of the goofy registrations in the first place.

As Mark Crispin Miller indicated on this week’s Bill Moyers Journal, we should be concerned, not by Acorn, but by two other types of activities. The first are the well-orchestrated and systematic attempts by Republican groups to suppress voter turn out.  What is voter suppression?

Well, it means various dirty tricks and tactics and legal devices used to shrink the size of the electorate before Election Day. So here we’re talking about, for example, interfering with registration drives or making them vulnerable to partisan challenges or passing laws requiring certain kinds of documentation at polling places. You know, stuff that harks back to Reconstruction and the Jim Crow laws. Caging voters, which is sending them registered letters with forms that if they don’t fill them out, their names will be stricken from the voter rolls. Voter purges. There’s a whole huge menu of extremely ingenious devices now being used I think with unprecedented brazenness to try to make the electorate as small as possible in advance of Election Day.

The second is through actual voter fraud.

This means using the computerized voting systems which we now have in place in at least 80% of the country. Using those systems through black box technology, precisely because it is so technical and it’s so opaque and it’s all run by private companies, private companies that have close ties to the Republican Party, the use of this kind of voting apparatus is extremely worrisome and something that we should be watching very carefully.

Why should we be concerned?

Well, I, in the aggregate, it does and could easily add up to millions of voters because we’re talking about a very, very broad range of devices, you know, both legal and illegal that will have a dramatic effect and that will add up. If hundreds of thousands of people are disenfranchised nationwide simply through voter purges alone, you see? That is significant. If the caging of voters results in the disenfranchisement of another 200,000, 300,000, we’re talking here about numbers that definitely do add up, you see, and that make a difference, are meant to make a difference come Election Day.

Soon will come the day when the U.S. will need U.N. election monitors to validate our elections. I suggest you watch the entire interview.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Joe Plumber and Anti-Freeze

joe-plumber.jpg

What’s all this about Joe the Plumber? Must he spread his wealth, will he be prejudiced if he buys the company, earning more than $250,000. The truth is that no one is being fully straight with us. Let’s think about it. Continue reading

4 Comments

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

The Final Presidential Debate

Final Debate Reuters

Here is my “two cents” on last night’s final presidential debate. In general, I would say that John McCain came off as the better debater, more forceful, but ultimately failed to convince. While he did a formidable job of distancing himself from President Bush with a few good one-liners and his senate record, ironically, he was undone by the dissonance within his own campaign. Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Is McCain being Mistreated?

mccain-unfairness.jpg

I have heard a lot of commentary over the past few days about how the McCain campaign is furious, feeling that it has been mistreated by the press. The argument goes something like this: Obama is playing filthy politics while McCain is getting all of the blame. I even read that it is not the McCain people but the “Obamamedia” who are gripped by insane rage”. Obviously, I am not completely objective here and am not going to pretend to be. But let’s look at the facts. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Angel Cabrera, Leadership, Education and the Crisis

angel-cabrera.jpg

During my early days working at the Instituto de Empresa Business School (“IE”) in Madrid, Spain, I had the great pleasure to learn from and become friends with Angel Cabrera, the former IE dean and now the current president of the Thunderbird School of Global Management. Angel (I sound like Sarah Palin, “do you mind if I call you Angel?”) recently created his Global Leaders Can Be Made blog.

Since the Enron scandal, Angel has been a key figure in rethinking business education to focus on breeding professionally responsible leaders. With that in mind, I wrote him an email the other day about the financial crisis and the implications for leadership training, saying,

In a sense, the financial crisis is an extension of Enron. Now more than ever in globalized markets where average citizens, businesses, and financial institutions are all dependent on one another (think about the credit interdependence that has caused the crash), we need better leaders. Leaders need to step up to the plate. The whole paradigm of corporations defined exclusively by their profits alone can no longer be seen as valuable to society. Transparency, sustainability, even paying taxes (the new patriotism) are now vital both to capitalism (finally) and society’s survival.

Angel kindly gave Grave Error a well needed plug by directly responding to my email in a post about whether business schools are responsible for the current financial mess, writing

Eric, as you would guess, I couldn’t agree with you more.  We need better leaders.  Leaders who understand and accept the professional responsibilities of managing a public corporation, to create true lasting value to society at large while providing competitive returns to investors that are commensurate with the risks they assume.

Some journalists are asking whether business schools may have some responsibility in the current financial mess for the way we have trained business leaders in the last two decades.  My answer:  absolutely!

It is refreshing to see someone out there asking to being held accountable for the mess and responsible for the clean up, as opposed to the easy blame Wall Street, blame Washington game.

Back in December 2001 just prior to getting a job at IE, I was completing IE’s International MBA program. I already had a JD and had worked as an attorney, but I thought that a master’s degree in business administration would give me that added insight into managers’ business concerns needed to become a more effective advocate. Throughout the MBA program, though, two things surprised me, making me believe that my JD was by far a more valuable degree, at least from an intellectual perspective:

  1. An ignorance on the part of the students and an absence in the course work about what a corporation really is, and
  2. A failure to instill a “managerial” identity and spirit in the MBA candidates. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Friends / Family

A Dose of Objectivity

moyers-journal.jpg

When it comes to the presidential election — and I am sure this is obvious — I am not always that most objective interlocutor.  I often get carried away by what I perceive as the unfairness and ugliness coming from the McCain side, and with my background as an attorney, I react by piling up all of the counter-arguments and writing them in this blog. Then last night I watched the latest edition of the Bill Moyers Journal, thank God for Bill Moyers, and got a nice dose of objectivity.

Bill Moyers was interviewing communications professor Kathleen Hall Jamieson about dirty campaign tactics. When asked about McCain attacking Obama’s associations, she said that what was most troubling was not the personality attacks, but the misleading policy ones.

What I respond to more so than the attacks and counterattacks about who knew whom where, and why, are those statements that are fundamentally deceptive about something that matters when you cast your vote.

She goes on to specifically criticize Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

McCain’s Angry Crowds and Jeremiah Wright

mccain-hate.jpg

I just read a very interesting analogy comparing John McCain’s crowds to Rev. Jeremiah Wright in an article by Khaled Hosseini. Hosseini is the Afghan American author of two best selling novels, The Kite Runner and A Thousand Splendid Night. Hosseini first points out the blatant anti-Muslim hate speech at McCain Palin rallies where speakers use Obama’s middle name, Hussein, with “unveiled scorn”. Hosseini writes,

Never mind that this evokes — and brazenly tries to resurrect — the unsavory, cruel days of our past that we thought we had left behind. Never mind that such jeers are deeply offensive to millions of peaceful, law-abiding Muslim Americans who must bear the unveiled charge, made by some supporters of Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin, that Obama’s middle name makes him someone to distrust — and, judging by some of the crowd reactions at these rallies, someone to persecute or even kill. As a secular Muslim, I too was offended. Obama’s middle name differs from my last name by only two vowels. Does the McCain-Palin campaign view me as a pariah too? Do McCain and Palin think there’s something wrong with my name?

The fact of the matter is that McCain Palin rallies have increasingly become hate fests, what Jonathan Capehart calls “McCain’s Chilling Dance wit the Dark Side“. Yesterday, McCain toned it down a little by asking his supporter to be just as ferocious but more respectful. But Hosseini is unconvinced. He argues that McCain’s failure to definitively and convincingly condemn the hate speech make McCain and his crowd no different from the Jeremiah Wright that Republicans deplore.

What I find most unconscionable is the refusal of the McCain-Palin tandem to publicly condemn the cries of “traitor,” “liar,” “terrorist” and (worst of all) “kill him!” that could be heard at recent rallies. McCain is perfectly capable of telling hecklers off. But not once did he or his running mate bother to admonish the people yelling these obscene — and potentially dangerous — words. They may not have been able to hear the slurs at the rallies, but surely they have had ample time since to get on camera and warn that this sort of ugliness has no place in an election season. But they have not. Simply calling Obama “a decent person” is not enough.

Is inaction tantamount to consent? The McCain campaign certainly thinks so when it comes to Obama and incendiary remarks from the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. By their own inaction, then, are McCain and Palin condoning these slurs? Or worse, are they willfully inciting the angry and venomous response that we have been witnessing at their rallies? If not, then what reaction are they hoping to evoke by their relentless public suggestions that Obama is basically an anti-American liar who won’t put “country first” and has an affection for terrorists? Do they not understand the kind of fire they are playing with?

By the way, wonder why McCain doesn’t bring up Jeremiah Wright? Time has argued that it would open the door to Sarah Palin’s dubious religious associations. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

She is like Us

Embedded video from CNN Video

I was watching the recent Larry King interview with Michelle Obama, and it made me realize that the Obamas are the ones who are the most normal and rational in this election. Not only does Michelle speak in complete sentences and give coherent interviews, she comes off like a normal human being, living in a normal country, with normal, common sense values. She isn’t fumbling or talking about killing and gutting animals, she isn’t the heiress to a beer fortune, defensive or an attack dog. She comes off as reasonable, gracious, kind, and genuine. In effect, she is “like us”.

If Sarah Palin or Cindy McCain, in contrast to Michelle Obama, represent small town values, then those values are foreign to me and not part of the America that I believe in. The contrast is startling. It’s ironic that white candidates and their white supporters open their mouths and come off like the radicals, while the black family better embodies who we want to be as a nation.

If my grandfather were only alive today! Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Essays, Obama 08