In last night’s Democratic presidential debate when Hillary was asked about political dynasties, she responded,
It did take a Clinton to clean [up] after the first Bush, and I think it might take a second one to clean up after the second Bush.
But this morning, my boss, Diego, very accurately raised the logical danger of Hillary’s response, “And then it will take another Bush to clean up after another Clinton”.
Hillary’s easy, teenie-bopper one-liner that sounded like something from a high school pep-rally before the big game against the old rival does not even come close to addressing one of the most important questions about her candidacy. Is voting for a second Clinton after a second Bush a disasterous sign for the American political system?
Anyone taking bets on the third Bush to be followed by Chelsea?