Unprecedented Censorship: How Bad Can She Be?

not-the-press.jpg

The press has threatened to boycott Palin’s U.N. speed date today with world leaders because the McCain Palin team were refusing to allow reporters access to the Republican vice presidential candidate. She still hasn’t held a single press conference. For the vice presidential debate, the Republicans have negotiated a format of short questions to further shield Palin from having to say too much.

Does McCain have that little confidence in Palin that he needs to censor her? Where is the transparency and openness? There is no other precedent in American history for a national candidate being kept this far from the public eye. Like we wouldn’t notice? You’d almost think she was a sequestered juror in a high profile murder case or an Alaskan teenager being protected from exposure to protection or certain unseemly reading materials.

I just wish someone out there would take us, the voting public, seriously. Come on, let her answer a few questions. How bad can she be?

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Why Would You Want to Win?

why.jpg

Whenever I speak with my father about these elections, I always ask his opinion about Obama’s chances of winning. And ever since early January of this year, he has always had the same response, “Why would Obama want to win?” His argument was, even way back nine months ago, that whoever wins would face two insurmountable obstacles making reelection in 2012 almost impossible. The first was a nasty and complicated Iraq pull out, and the second was an economic recession and financial crisis.

It appears that we are already in said financial crisis. And if my father’s assessment is correct, things don’t look great for Obama because McCain looks even worse. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Remember Paula Jones?

todd-palin.jpg

Do you remember Paula Jones? I bet you remember Monica Lewinsky. Paula was suing Bill Clinton, and in the course of the discovery process, Bill tried to hide his relationship with Monica, just in case it could be used as evidence against him. Later when he was being investigated for perjury and suborning perjury, President Bill Clinton said that he didn’t have to play by the rules because he believed the case was baseless.

Now Sarah Palin’s “first dude”, her husband, is refusing to testify in an abuse of power investigation into his wife’s conduct as Governor of Alaska because he “no longer believes the legislature’s investigation is legitimate”. Back in 1998, I was appalled that Clinton thought he was above the law and had some special right to bypass the judicial process. As I wrote last year about the matter,

President Clinton repeatedly justified his alleged “obstruction of justice” as having been in response to Ms. Jones’ unfounded and frivolous lawsuit. But if the President shared his feminist constituents’ beliefs and trusted the legal system, he would have allowed justice to run its normal course instead of trying to impede a woman’s right to bring a sexual harassment case against her employer.

I feel the same way today about the Palin’s. What right does Todd Palin (or anyone else for that matter) have to ignore a subpoena to testify in an investigation? Is his opinion about the legitimacy of an investigation superior to that of the democratically elected Alaska legislature? Does he have jurisdiction over the legislature? Why do we have legislatures, judges, courts, juries, or law enforcement if it all comes down to guys like Clinton or Dude Palin extra-judicially determining they’re above the law?

What Clinton didn’t understand then and what Palin doesn’t understand now is that they are not fighting to protect their rights, but are disrespecting and undermining the public institutions that comprise the American democracy. If they believed in the system, then they would show a little more faith in the rule of law in this country — like ordinary Americans are forced to do every day in court — and let justice run its due course.

3 Comments

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

How Do You Talk to an Angel?

Believe it or not, I was just reading something that was not about the U.S. presidential elections. It was much more profound. I happened upon an article about the new 90210 spin-off. The original Beverly Hills, 90210 came out during my first few months of college back in 1990. That was also the year of “Hammer Time“, “The Groove is in the Heart”, Godfather III and Rocky V.

When I really press my memory and think back hard enough, I can bring back a couple of different images and sensations from that first semester of college: the Washington fall — dark nights and crisp cool air. My small gang of friends talking crap, thinking we were smart, taking the day off for the Star Wars Trilogy. There was my roommate, Dave; Fred who was accused of being a pseudo-existentialist yet complimented for being so ethnic. There was Julio, next!; Mo’, “that’s cool” (may he rest in peace), and Kevin who today is the father of my goddaughter. And if I let my memory bleed into the beginning of 1991, I see myself sitting in bed one January evening watching CNN televise the first Gulf War, being called to the floor’s lounge to panic about a possible draft, and I can also smell the scent of tear gas from riots in Mount Pleasant that found there way across town.

Nevertheless, when reading about 90210, I was thinking about something else from those days. There was a short lived TV show from the same time period about a young band; the show had a cheesie theme song. I couldn’t remember the name of the song for the life of me, but I could remember that Dave and I used to make fun of its ridiculous lyrics, something absurd about an angel. I did every google search possible, and finally after various word combinations, I found the name of the show and song: The Heights and “How Do You Talk to an Angel“. According to wikipedia, the show ran from August 1992 to November of the same year, but I don’t think those dates are correct. All of my recollections of trying to figure out how communicating with an angel was also like catching a fallen star took place in the dorms which I had lived in until May of 1992. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Digressions, Friends / Family

Bring in the Marines

mccain-petraeus.jpg

John McCain is a tough guy, and like all tough guys he solves problems by being tough. Toughness is definitely what we need, and if John Wayne McCain were president, he’d fire the chairman of the S.E.C. Then he’d probably convene the Joint Chiefs of Staff and bring in General David Petraeus to clean up the mess. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

In Praise of Regulations

One thing that has historically set the U.S. apart from other nations is its strong adherence to the Rule of Law. Not just through legislation, but through regulations (and the U.S.’s special brand of rules for promulgating regulations), the country has been able to afford all sorts of protections to consumers, workers, investors and businesses without having to increase the size of government a la European socialism.

I know it’s a Republican catch phrase to call everything that they don’t like “big government” but there is absolutely no relationship between regulating activity and increasing the size of government. So it is no wonder that McCain’s recent schizophrenic attacks don’t quite square with reality. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

The United States of Corruption

straight-talk.jpg

John McCain declared yesterday that both Washington and Wall Street were corrupt. By Washington, I can only assume that he means the U.S. government comprised of both the Congress for which he has been a member for more than 20 years and the Bush administration. By Wall Street, I assume that he means the back bone of our financial system and the international emblem and symbol of America’s economy.

I am not saying that this statement isn’t true. It may very well be. But it seems kind of strange coming from the mouth of the country’s greatest patriot and hero. First, I can’t recall a U.S. presidential candidate or statesmen ever so boldly criticizing his country. In the U.S., we call Venezuela corrupt and we call Nigeria corrupt, but we would never look in the mirror and bravely accuse Amurika (as McCain pronounces it) as being equally rotten. If John McCain really believes what he said, then kudos to him for finally speaking out.

And that’s precisely my next point, finally! McCain has been in Washington for how long? Is he one of the Washington corrupt? If not, who is corrupt in Washington? The Bush Administration for the past eight years? The Republican Congress for six of the last eight years? Or did this corruption just start in the past two years? Maybe they are all corrupt, each and every one of them except for John McCain. He has spoken out against pork and earmarks, but surely those are more wasteful than corrupting. Surely, pork and earmarks did not lead to today’s financial crisis. How has McCain’s 90% pro-Bush voting record or insistence on deregulation of the financial markets thwarted corruption? If McCain hasn’t been able to put a dent in corruption between 1982 and 2008 in Washington, how is he going to change things now?

From a purely pragmatic standpoint, how responsible is it to call the U.S. government and banking and financial systems corrupt? What effect does it have on the market, on value of the dollar and U.S. debt, and on global confidence in the American economy and businesses? Or the future of Wall Street (and the U.S. for that matter) as the financial center of the world? If you thought factory jobs were heading south, wait until there is white collar flight to less risky markets like London.

One last question: were John McCain president of a foreign nation, would he negotiate with the corrupt United States without conditions?

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Campaign Media Analysis

From a recent installment of the Bill Moyers Journal, we finally get some serious questions into why there are no serious questions about our candidates. Here’s Bill Moyers’ intro to “Campaign Media Analysis: Brooke Gladstone and Les Payne“: Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

Admiral Wasilla Hussein

wasilla_cityhall.jpg

What do McCain, Palin, and Obama have in common? They are all linked through the Arab language. Barack Hussein Obama isn’t the only one with an affinity for Arabic. Both McCain’s father and grandfather were Navy Admirals, and as we all know, the word “admiral” in English is derived from the Arabic “Amir al bahar” meaning “the prince of the sea”.

And guess what small town U-S-A town means “affinity” in Arabic? You got it, Wasilla. I wonder if Fox News will now start referring to Palin’s tiny mayoral caliphate as having an affinity with the Arab world each and every time they allude to her extensive down-home qualifications and values, just as they do with Barack Hussein.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08

The Craziness

Is it all so absurd that we need Matt Damon to say the obvious? Why have we come to this?

Two of the most prestigious firms on Wall Street have just taken fatal beatings — much of this with the help of Senator Phil Gramm’s deregulation of the banking industry, with John McCain’s full support. Yet, no one is paying attention to the obvious. Yes, you can read what the Washington Post or the New York Times says about it, but serious journalism is now considered somehow untrustworthy.

Thanks to my friend, Nadia, for sending me the video.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays, Obama 08