Would it be racist to assume the obvious: that just one single non-white justice during the Supreme Court’s first two hundred years would have reached a better judgment, say, in Dred Scott or Plessy than the Court’s first 100 exclusively all white male justices had?
Non sequitur.
It is, as I have become lugubriously aware, a foregone societal conclusion that to be white, leaves one in a default and exclusive position of being racist.
The commentary by Sotomayoron, was flatly, unequivocally ~ racist, without possibility of rebuttle.
She is, for more than just this reason, a very poor choice to defend the “spirit and intent” of the world’s greatest document.
But since Bush & Cronie, Co. bought the SCOTUS, it is a rather moot point now.
Rome will, oh yes it will, burn yet again.
I’m bringing the steaks, who’s got the midget pron???