Monthly Archives: February 2009

Political Ironies

obam-and-geithner.jpg

Here are three political ironies from the last few days:

First, as Obama has required greater transparency and stricter scrutiny over who works for his administration, he is now receiving criticism for four of his picks — Tim Geithner, Nancy Killefer, Tom Daschle, and Bill Richardson — the latter three all withdrawn. Yet were it not for the heightened scrutiny and greater public demand for a different breed of civil servants created by the Obama movement, these characters would never have been weeded out.

Next, while the Republicans continue to be obsessed with cutting taxes, it looks like Democrats (Geithner, Daschle, and Killefer) simply don’t pay their share; in other words, Republicans hate taxes, Democrats don’t pay them. You wonder what a congressional tax audit would look like.

Finally, Sarah Palin rode into town this week in an attempt to repair her image. In doing so, she cried and whined about the Washington and media elite culture that “mocked” her. Governor Palin surely must have forgotten how she first appeared on the national stage at the GOP Convention, mocking Barack Obama as a do-nothing community organizer and boasting herself as a political pit bull. Then on the campaign trail the ever confident pit bull sneered at Obama’s foreigness. Now all that is left of the pit bull hockey mom is the smeared lipstick.

Leave a comment

Filed under Obama 44

The Great American Free Market Fallacy

forgotten-capitalism.jpg

It is kind of fun to hear the liberals on one side decry the evils of deregulation while the conservatives moan about Wall Street greed. Those furthest to the left triumph in the fall of capitalism while the Republican ideologues are in a panic about government intervention and seek shelter in tax cuts. But the truth of the matter is that both sides are wrong. The American free market does not exist, and while certain types of regulation are essential for the well-being of the economy, there are plenty of Democrats out there to blame for the counter-productive deregulation.

True capitalists out there have to face the fact that Bill Clinton was a much better Republican than George W. Bush ever was. Under Bush, the Republicans talked a good show, but never really walked the capitalist walk. Rather, the government systematically intervened in the marketplace. Republicans may have called them tax credits, subsidies, permits, deregulation, or even war, but they’re all examples of intervening in the marketplace in favor of industries and companies at the expense of the free market. If you associate deficit spending with government intervention, then George W. and Ronald R were the great swelling intervenors. And yes, the Republicans’ obsession with what Americans do in their private time and behind closed doors is all about government intervention.

When yesterday on This Week with George Stephanopoulos Jim DeMint (R-SC) accused the Obama Administration and the House Democrats of trying to pass the largest spending bill in U.S. history, Barney Frank (D-MA) correctly noted,

The largest spending bill in history is going to turn out to be the war in Iraq. And one of the things, if we’re going to talk about spending, I don’t — I have a problem when we leave out that extraordinarily expensive, damaging war in Iraq, which has caused much more harm than good, in my judgment.

And I don’t understand why, from some of my conservative friends, building a road, building a school, helping somebody get health care, that’s — that’s wasteful spending, but that war in Iraq, which is going to cost us over $1 trillion before we’re through — yes, I wish we hadn’t have done that. We’d have been in a lot better shape fiscally.

. . . The problem is that we look at spending and say, “Oh, don’t spend on highways. Don’t spend on health care. But let’s build Cold War weapons to defeat the Soviet Union when we don’t need them. Let’s have hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars going to the military without a check.” Unless everything’s on the table, then you’re going to have a disproportionate hit in some places.

But it’s not just military spending. It’s also the special treatment to oil companies, mega farms, the banking and auto industries, and other areas. So when Senator DeMint says that we’re facing a decision between a free market economy and a government-directed economy I wonder which country he is talking about. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays

Why GOP Governors Need the Stimulus

gop-governors.jpg

The Bush tax cuts were nothing more than a delayed tax hike. For the last eight years, we increased public spending – especially on warfare – while decreasing tax revenues from both individual and corporate taxpayers. The way we paid for the tax cuts in the short term was to simply borrow that money abroad. Isn’t it ironic then that one of the arguments against the stimulus package by the House Republicans is that it would indebt a whole future generation of Americans. Well, Bush then already did that, didn’t he?

It is no surprise that Republican state governors see things differently from their fellow party members in Congress. With a sharp decrease in tax revenues and fees (that’s one of the tricks, decrease taxes but increase fees for licenses, etc), the states are feeling the pain and are on the verge of bankruptcy. Furthermore, states don’t have the same credit rating as the federal government and cannot turn to the Chinese as the borrower of last resort. Without money from a stimulus package (of some sort), the states cannot fund basic services like public schools, roads, sanitation, etc, and tax cuts certainly aren’t going to cover these costs, no matter what stubborn ideology you may adhere to.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essays